05 April 2007

Nancy's Visit to the Butcher Shop

Nancy's Visit to the Butcher Shop

Philip V. Brennan
Wednesday, April 4, 2007

"O, pardon me, thou bleeding piece of earth, that I am meek and gentle with these butchers!"
— Mark Antony to Caesar's corpse

Shakespeare, "Julius Caesar"

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has donned her diplomat's hat and gone to visit Syrian President Bashar Assad knowing full well that Bashar Assad is a butcher who stands accused of murdering Lebanese statesmen, and of launching a decades-long war of terror and assassination against Lebanon.

Perhaps Nancy Pelosi is comfortable in the company of butchers — she's long been an ardent supporter of those members of the abortion industry who have killed 40 million unborn babies without a murmur of protest from the present speaker of the House.

If Mrs. Pelosi doesn't want to believe her host is a butcher, she should pop over to Lebanon and have a chat with Father Joseph Abu Ghazale, the parish priest at the Maronite Catholic Church of St Anthony's, which is a bare 50 yards from the site where Lebanese Industry Minister Pierre Gemayel was gunned down by Assad's assassins.


More.

Arab Expert: Pelosi Appeasing Dictators in Middle East

Arab Expert: Pelosi Appeasing Dictators in Middle East

From the NewsMax.com Staff
For the story behind the story...
Wednesday, April 4, 2007 11:24 a.m. EDT
More.

This article was written by Julie Stahl, Jerusalem Bureau Chief at CNSNews.com

Syrian politicians have hailed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's visit to Damascus as a diplomatic triumph that may force the Bush administration - which opposed the visit - to change its policy toward President Bashar Assad's regime.

Pelosi, the most senior U.S. official to visit Syria in several years, met with Assad on Wednesday.

The California Democrat said that she had discussed concerns regarding Iran; the situation in Iraq; Damascus' support for Hamas and Hizballah terrorists in the Palestinian self-rule territories and Lebanon; peace in the Middle East; and the continued abduction of three Israeli soldiers (one held by Hamas and two by Hizballah).

"We came in friendship, hope and determined that the road to Damascus is the road to peace," Pelosi said at a press conference following the meeting.

More.

The bitch is bound and determined to bring America to her knees.
Her continued shenanigans will hurt this country and she should be tried and impeached for it.



Nancy Pelosi Embraces Terror State

Nancy Pelosi Embraces Terror State

NewsMax.com Wires
Wednesday, April 4, 2007

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has come under criticism for her visit to Syria as Bush administration officials charge that the trip undermines U.S. efforts to isolate the hard-line Arab country.

The White House was also sharply critical of visits to Syria in December by Pelosi's fellow Democrats Sen. John Kerry, Sen. Christopher Dodd and Sen. Bill Nelson, as well as a trip by Republican Sen. Arlen Specter.

The fact is, Syria is a brutal dictatorship that actively supports terrorists – including Iraqi Sunni insurgents that operate from Syrian territory.

More.

Democrats continue to support terrorism.
This will cause another major attack on the United States.
Their continued appeasement to the Islamo-Fascists will be their downfall.
Unforntunately, it will take another 9-11 like attack to wake them up.



02 April 2007

Nazi Bitch News

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to visit Syria over White House objections

WASHINGTON -- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will visit Syria, a country President Bush has shunned as a sponsor of terrorism, despite being asked by the administration not to go.
”In our view, it is not the right time to have these sort of high-profile visitors to Syria,” State Department spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters Friday.
Pelosi arrived in Israel on Friday in what is her second fact-finding trip to the Middle East since taking over leadership in the House in January.
Her repeat trip, an indication she plans to play a role in foreign policy, is also a direct affront to the administration, which says such diplomatic overtures by lawmakers can do more harm than good.

Pelosi shrugs off White House criticism

BEIRUT, Lebanon - House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (news, bio, voting record) on Monday shrugged off White House criticism of her upcoming trip to Damascus, saying she had "great hope" for reviving U.S. relations with Syria and changing its behavior.

Speaking hours after arriving in Lebanon, Pelosi indicated the Bush administration was singling out her trip to Syria, but ignoring the recent visits by Republican members of Congress.

White House renews objection to top lawmaker's Syria trip


WASHINGTON (AFP) - The White House on Monday objected to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (news, bio, voting record)'s looming visit to Damascus, saying she risked undermining US-led efforts to isolate Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

"It sends the wrong message to have high-level US officials going there to have photo opportunities that Assad then exploits," said spokeswoman Dana Perino told reporters. "We discourage such trips by high-ranking US officials."

Asked whether the White House viewed Pelosi's visit as a mere "photo opportunity," Perino replied: "I believe that Assad thinks of it that way and he tries to use it as leverage."

This bitch needs to learn her place.
It sure as hell isn't Syria, unless she issues a change of address.

27 March 2007

THE HOUSE DEMOCRAT BUDGET The largest tax hike in history!

I said this was coming. Here it is.

The Democrat budget reported Wednesday proposes the largest tax increase in U.S. history – $392.5 billion over 5 years – mainly to finance immense new spending through 2012. Although they try to insist otherwise, the figures in their budget assume these tax increases will occur automatically – and without them they cannot achieve a balanced budget, as they claim.

The largest tax hike in history!

14 March 2007

Air Force 3

Lest we forget!

Air Force 3

The “Let’s Lose Now” Caucus

The “Let’s Lose Now” Caucus

By The Editors

Say at least this for House Democrats: They are beginning to find the courage of their profoundly mistaken convictions. They have moved on from pretending that a nonbinding resolution against sending additional troops into Baghdad and Anbar Province is a serious blow against the war in Iraq to more strenuous attempts to handicap our prosecution of the fight there.

The House Appropriations Committee will take up a bill this week that would authorize $120 billion in additional spending to cover — among other things — the Iraq surge. Pelosi has known all along that refusing to fund the surge would be a political mistake, since it would open her Democrats to charges of defunding troops already in the field. At the same time, Pelosi’s liberal base — and much of her House majority — wants the war stopped, now. The bill tries to keep them happy by setting deadlines for troop withdrawals. President Bush would be told to certify in July, and then again in October, that the Iraqi government had met certain political and military benchmarks. The bill calls for withdrawing U.S. troops within 180 days if these benchmarks aren’t met (although Bush could waive them), and by September of 2008 no matter what. Democrats may also insert language “forbidding” the president to undertake military operations against Iran without congressional approval.


More.

The Pelosi Plan for Iraq

The Pelosi Plan for Iraq

It makes perfect sense, if the goal is winning votes in the United States.

Tuesday, March 13, 2007; Page A16

THE RESTRICTIONS on Iraq war funding drawn up by the House Democratic leadership are exquisitely tailored to bring together the party's leftist and centrist wings. For the Out of Iraq Caucus, which demands that Congress force a withdrawal of all U.S. troops by the end of this year, there is language that appears to deliver that mandate, albeit indirectly. For those who prefer a more moderate course, there is another withdrawal deadline, in August 2008. Either way, almost all American troops would be out of Iraq by the time the next election campaign begins in earnest. And there are plenty of enticements on the side: more money for wounded veterans, for children's health, for post-Hurricane Katrina reconstruction.

More.

Pelosi Ain't no General...Just a Nazi

Do we really need a Gen. Pelosi?

Congress can cut funding for Iraq, but it shouldn't micromanage the war.
March 12, 2007

AFTER WEEKS OF internal strife, House Democrats have brought forth their proposal for forcing President Bush to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq by 2008. The plan is an unruly mess: bad public policy, bad precedent and bad politics. If the legislation passes, Bush says he'll veto it, as well he should.

It was one thing for the House to pass a nonbinding vote of disapproval. It's quite another for it to set out a detailed timetable with specific benchmarks and conditions for the continuation of the conflict. Imagine if Dwight Eisenhower had been forced to adhere to a congressional war plan in scheduling the Normandy landings or if, in 1863, President Lincoln had been forced by Congress to conclude the Civil War the following year. This is the worst kind of congressional meddling in military strategy.

This is not to say that Congress has no constitutional leverage — only that it should exercise it responsibly. In a sense, both Bush and the more ardent opponents of the war are right. If a majority in Congress truly believes that the war is not in the national interest, then lawmakers should have the courage of their convictions and vote to stop funding U.S. involvement. They could cut the final checks in six months or so to give Bush time to manage the withdrawal. Or lawmakers could, as some Senate Democrats are proposing, revoke the authority that Congress gave Bush in 2002 to use force against Iraq.


More.


Nazi bitch thinks she a fuckin' general now.
Idiot.

10 March 2007

Remember This?!

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA): "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process. The responsibility of the United States in this conflict is to eliminate weapons of mass destruction, to minimize the danger to our troops and to diminish the suffering of the Iraqi people." (Rep. Nancy Pelosi, "Statement on U.S. Led Military Strike Against Iraq," Press Release, 12/16/98)

That bitch will say anything to the contrary now.